Last Saturday 10 May, a full page article was featured in the Sun Newspaper, on page 6 about my forthcoming book, Toxic World Toxic People - The Essential Guide To Health, Happiness, Parenting and Conscious Living. Journalist Helen Gilbert pulled facts from it to write her article.
Helen had written about 4 dangerous common toxins in her article titled 'Whats Your Poision'. - She focused on lead, mercury, cadmium, aluminium (known as aluminum in the USA) that are all around us - not only in the environment but which are now found in some of the foods we eat, the medicines we take, the products we put on our skin and what we build our homes and other structures with. Even many infant formulas contain concerning levels of multiple toxic chemicals, including aluminum. I have written about these 4, fairly extensively in one of the chapters in my book. Helen pulled some facts from that chapter.
By Tuesday afternoon, I had discovered that one of the UK's largest Science websites "Sense About Science'' had completely discredited the article. They wrote a counter article called 'Tackling Misconceptions About Toxins'
Judging by some pretty major events throughout history, mainstream Science doesn't always seem to want the public knowing about certain dangerous chemicals because usually they were the organisations that said they were safe from the start, only to be proven otherwise years later.
Does anyone remember the huge lies we were told about smoking , DDT, Lead, Thalidomide, Vioxx to name just a small few? All of these were promoted as safe, healthy, and good for us by these sorts of 'science' organisations.
Now we all know the real truth.
These were not just a little lie but were in fact big big lies, with billions upon billions of pounds being made by many corporations. But more important than that, think about all the people that were harmed because of these lies, the lack of proper testing, and how they were marketed to the public. Deaths, disease and cancers were caused directly because of these lies. And it could actually be in the millions. In all of these cases, studies were falsified, people were paid off to keep quiet or paid to tell lies so that they could continue to sell their product. It wasn't an easy task to get them to take responsibility for the harm they caused. And in each of these instances, Doctors and Scientists were speaking on behalf of these companies for their medicines, pesticides and cigarettes saying to the public 'you can trust us we are experts'
Yet look at what we now know. They lied.
Most of you reading this will know that we are now living in a world where our authorities are being bought more than ever before, to do what powerful companies want them to do. Congressmen are being bought to vote on things that interest companies, our Governments tell lies constantly and don’t ever seem to do what they promise and pharmaceutical companies are being sued for fraud and misconduct left right and center. This is pretty much a fact. And its not on a small scale - its rampant abuse.
To those who are aware of this, nowadays when mainstream science ridicule something, it usually is because they are trying to squash the truth from being brought to light to the majority of the public. They try desperately to pull the wool over the eyes of the people by using the same old routine 'trust me, I'm a expert'
In these situations, I often remind myself of this very famous quote:
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer, German philosopher (1788 – 1860)
Yep. Damn straight. The concerns about DDT, Lead, Smoking, Vioxx and Thalidomide were all at first ridiculed, violently opposed, but now, are self evident.
Sence About Science pulled apart Helen’s article saying that every statement I had made, was not true and that I was alarming the public.
But little do they realise that how they wrote their article (see the very badly written PDF, see here) was an absolute joke and I can show you why. There are so many holes in what they have written that its almost laughable.
Its immediate to see, that they basically want the public to believe that natural chemicals are far more dangerous than manmade ones, and that no disease or cancer is ever caused to anyone by being exposed to chemicals! Whilst it's true, some natural chemicals can harm in certain amounts or in those that are sensitive to them, but most of them do not as they don't have the chemical compositions that synthetic chemicals do. And a good point to make about chemicals in general is, how do we know that some individuals won't be sensitive to them or worse, seriously harmed by them? Something that is not harmful to one person may in fact be very harmful to someone else! If you have a system in your body that is already suffering from something else, for instance your endocrine system (hormones) aren't perhaps working efficiently, then a chemical that is proven to harm the endocrine system may very likely make you worse!
It is therefore highly likely that synthetic chemicas are causing cancers (and in this case, causing Alzheimer's) because we know in the studies that have been done on some of the concerning chemicals that this is where the evidence is pointing! Many man made chemicals are known carcinogens! That is a fact. Yet what is more worrying is that some of the chemicals these organisations support, and say are safe, have been put onto the market before being effectively tested for safety over the long term, or if they are safe when mixed with other chemicals!
So these science bodies are making statements that have not been proven at all to be true in the first place!
They do not know that their chemicals DO NOT CAUSE harm. The statements they make to the public are not based on real facts. They twist words around very cleverly and are relying on gullible people coming to their site who think that what they say is always 100% scientifically and ethically correct. Often these sorts of science websites mix truth in amongst their lies, so that the average person won't be able to read into the real lies!
They said I am alarming the public with my information but that is GOOD, I want people to be alarmed, we are facing an epidemic with toxicity, like never before seen in the world.
Now, onto the topic of this blog post.
Does Aluminum exposure cause Alzheimer's?
Well, what is Aluminum?
Aluminum is a natural metal that is found in the earth’s crust. Its now around us in ways we can’t quite even comprehend. Its basically everywhere. Now the science community like to say this that it is indeed everywhere too, but they forget that it wasn't as prevalent as this 100 years ago! It was always in the soil and some was found in the air, but now its also found in our foods, cosmetics, medicines, and homes.
Many power plants and other industries put loads of aluminium particles into the air. And whilst we do ingest a lot of it through what we eat, we now are also having aluminum added to many everyday items! This is where the problem lies, that its not just found naturally its being added on purpose to cosmetics, food and medicines. Some are saying there’s now also huge levels of extra aluminum in the air, due to ‘geo-engineering’
Most of the public simply do not know this stuff!
When something is found around us so much, its only natural our bodies will also then contain these metals and chemicals. Whilst some levels of course is normal, increased levels is not always safe for an individual, and many studies are showing this to be very true. As you will soon discover, studies have been done on deceased Alzheimer brains and high levels of aluminum have been found in their tissues.
When you understand that aluminum is a proven neurotoxin (which even the scientists don’t deny) and that its found in so many aspects of our lives, then you can perhaps understand that there comes a point when a high level of aluminum becomes a problem (for some people) because the brain just can’t handle anymore of it. Its like slowly drinking alcohol, you might not feel the effects at first, but the more you have, the more likely you are going to behave strangely and eventually feel unwell.
Whilst our body can naturally detox things to a degree, we are not like bottomless garbage bins that can handle having chemicals piled into us. There comes a time when its too much. And many people now have bodies that are already struggling to cope with the amount of chemicals in their bodies.
Lets look at what Sense about Science said in relation to aluminium contributing to causing Alzheimer's.
Alzheimer’s Society says:
“There is no evidence that aluminium causes Alzheimer's disease. Aluminium is found in protein build-ups associated with Alzheimer’s disease, but that doesn’t mean that this is due to too much aluminium being present in the body - the same is true of other metals.”
I love how they made such a sweeping and 'final' statement to really throw people off the scent. 'The same is true of other metals'. Oh really. Have you studied all the other metals in relation to Alzheimer's then and have you studied the effects other chemicals have with several other ones, or what about the thousands of others we have in our environment and therefore in our bodies?
Lets now exam what the 'other side of science' is saying about whether or not Alzheimer's is being contributed to by Aluminum.
A study published on the highly esteemed peer reviewed medical journal site, pub med stated in the abstract of a study by Professor Chris Exley (who by the way seems to be doing a lot of research into the effects aluminum and other metals are having in regards to causing Alzheimer's and other health problems - so he's one to pay attention to i'd say - click on his name to read his further studies!):
Aluminium is neurotoxic. Its free ion, Al3+ (aq), is highly biologically reactive and uniquely equipped to do damage to essential cellular (neuronal) biochemistry. This unequivocal fact must be the starting point in examining the risk posed by aluminium as a neurotoxin in humans. Aluminium is present in the human brain and it accumulates with age. The most recent research demonstrates that a significant proportion of individuals older than 70 years of age have a potentially pathological accumulation of aluminium somewhere in their brain. What are the symptoms of chronic aluminiumintoxication in humans? What if neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease are the manifestation of the risk of aluminium as a neurotoxin? How might such an (outrageous) hypothesis be tested? You can see the link for this study here:
And its also very interesting to note that when you type the following keywords Aluminum Alzheimer’s into pub med, 988 studies come up! Of course not all are going to support the hypothesis that Aluminum can cause Alzheimer’s but if you have the time, check out how many actually do! Looks like there’s a lot of concerned people (Scientists!) with some compelling proof, right? And, from what I have been reading their have been scientists that have been very concerned about Aluminium for the last 100 years!
Now it's also worth saying, am I the only person in the world saying that aluminium could be causing alzheimer's? No, of course not! Could it be that I have read books, and studies on the same subject matter, and that I also listened to Doctors and Scientists speak out about this very valid health concern in the world today? Yes! Am I lone horse, saying something that no one else knows? Of course not. The numbers on 'this side' are increasing every day. And its purely because of Science! The medical studies that have proven certain things in relation to chemicals to be true!
In an article appearing in the Townsend Letter for Doctors (November 1993), Dr. Michael A. Weiner, executive director of the Alzheimer's Research Institute summarized our present understanding of the dangers of aluminum exposure when he stated:
"aluminum has been known as a neurotoxic substance for nearly a century. The scientific literature on its toxic effects has now grown to a critical mass. It is not necessary to conclude that aluminum causes Alzheimer's disease to recommend that it be reduced or eliminated as a potential risk. It is the only element noted to accumulate in the tangle-bearing neurons characteristic of the disease and is also found in elevated amounts in four regions of the brain of Alzheimer's patients."
In the past, there hasn't been many definitive studies that proved this link but last month, a study came out that was undertaken by Professor Exley from Keele University in the UK which showed that they had found 'unequivocally', high levels of aluminum in the brain of a deceased Alzheimer's sufferer. The deceased had been exposed to aluminum at work. (1)
Another subject in the study, also a British woman, who had died of Alzheimer's was also found to have high levels of aluminum in her tissues. Approximately 16 years before her death, there had been an industrial accident near where she lived where 20 metric tons of aluminum sulphate had gone into the local water supply. So its highly likely the lady literally drank herself to developing Alzheimer's.
Interesting to note in this image that the 'alzheimer' brain reduces greatly in size and looks like its been eaten by something. What could do this? Hmmm perhaps something that eats away at nerves and tissues? What has been shown to do this? Aluminium! It is a selective neurotoxin that attacks the nerves.
And in a story seen in the Daily Mail article titled Top Scientist Links Disabilities with mother's exposure to mass poisoning in 1988 Professor Exley, (mentioned previously in this article) has been investigating other concerns associated to this massive spill of aluminum sulphate (in case you are wondering why its added to our water supplies it's to make it appear clear) which happened in Camelford North Cornwall back in 1988. Instead of this chemical going into a storage tank, it was added directly into the water supply without the publics knowledge.
Many locals then went on to drinking this highly toxic water. One of them was Sarah Matta, now a mother to 7 children. After being unsure as to why so many of her children were seriously unwell, Sarah got in contact with Professor Exley (who is one of the UK's top Scientists in relation to bioinorganic chemistry) to tell him what had happened to her and her family.
6 of her 7 children have disabilities which sound suspiciously to me, like problems that can occur from toxicity. Between them they have: possible autism, developmental problems, speech problems, and anxiety. Sarah herself had blood tests taken and was found to have aluminium levels 20 times higher than is normal.
Professor Exley is extremely concerned that others who were also in contact with the poisoned water supply may have harmed themselves, including their children through their exposure. He told the Daily Mail:
''Aluminium is toxic. Studies in animals show that if you feed mothers aluminium in the water supply, the offspring will exhibit developmental problems.''
I find it interesting we have Science bodies (with very dubious funding connections) talking about Aluminium as being 'nothing to worry about' yet a highly esteemed scientist who is an expert in his field has been studying this chemical for many years and is discovering many alarming connections. And it's interesting to note that he is not gaining anything out of saying Aluminium is dangerous! Yet as you will read below, could it be that Pharmaceutical companies and chemical companies have a lot more to lose?
A Film maker also became so concerned about Aluminum and how it has invaded our lives, that he made the film The Age Of Aluminum - you can see the full movie below this post, I highly recommend you take a look. The film exposes environmental disasters that have happened in the UK, South Africa and Hungary due to the Aluminum Industry. The film features an interview with Christopher Shaw who is a well known neuroscientist. He shares his concerns about the effects Aluminum is having on human health:
"Many researchers are beginning to accept that aluminum has some sort of role to play in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's. Whether it does in others is still an open question, but Alzheimer's is really coming into focus and it's fairly clear that the body burden of aluminum from all the sources to which humans are exposed may be contributing to Alzheimer's disease."
And Dr Joseph Mercola stated in his article First Case Study To Show Direct Link Between Alzheimer's and Aluminum Toxicity that Aluminum heads straight to your brain:
Aluminum is to your central nervous system as cigarette smoke is to your lungs. Scientists are clear that toxic metals damage brain tissue and lead to degenerative disease by producing oxidative stress—and aluminum is one of the worst offenders. With Alzheimer's rates skyrocketing, today's multiple avenues of aluminum exposure are of great concern. Just as with particles in the environment, once aluminum is in your tissues, your body has a difficult time releasing it. This toxic metal serves absolutely no biological purpose, so the less of it you ingest, the better.
Once in your body, it travels around easily, unimpeded, piggybacking on your iron transport system. It crosses biological barriers that normally keep other types of toxins out, such as your blood-brain barrier. Over time, aluminum can accumulate in your brain and do serious damage your neurological health—regardless of your age. Aluminum toxicity may be doing as much damage to our children as to our seniors.
I could continue on and on about this subject. I could link to the studies proving the concerns. I spent about an hour writing this, I don’t have time to go into it more, but oh boy, I easily could. All that I would urge you to do is, do your own research, look for non government, non pharmaceutical, non chemical company funded studies. That’s where the truth lies. I've written a fair bit more about this subject in my book.
Many Alzheimer’s organisations are often funded by the drug companies who make the medications for the treatment of this awful disease. And many of these drug companies also add aluminum to their medicines.
People like myself are simply trying to educate people about decreasing their exposure to Aluminum, and to encourage them to detox their body with proven metal chelators. If the public started doing this on a huge scale, then perhaps its worth considering, would the Alzheimer’s drug industry fall apart? Is this why there is such a huge denial amongst the mainstream Science industry? Whilst some say Aluminium accumulation is not the only cause of this brain disease, it is quite possibly a huge factor.
Another area where a lot of aluminium is also found, is in the vaccine industry as its used as an adjuvant. When you take a look at the chart below, and see how much money is tied up with vaccinations, you can quickly understand that the purchase of Aluminium for just these medicines alone, is actually quite hard to fathom, and therefore, if someone is threatening that industry for fears around its safety, there's going to be people fighting very hard to keep it all quiet.
And, Alzheimer’s is not the only neurological problem Aluminium can cause. It is now also being linked to causing Autism and other neurological problems. Christina England, investigative journalist for Vactruth writes:
A recent study conducted by Canadian scientists Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic revealed that the more vaccines that children receive containing the adjuvant aluminum, the greater their chance is of developing autism, autoimmune diseases and neurological problems in the future.
In 2013, in their paper, published by Springer Science+Business Media, titled Aluminum in the Central Nervous System: Toxicity in Humans and Animals, Vaccine Adjuvants, and Autoimmunity, they revealed that during a 17-year period, the rates of autism had increased significantly in countries that had the most vaccinations containing the adjuvant aluminum. 
And in another study titled Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are They Safe? also by Canadian scientists Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic their abstract states:
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science's understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.
So it seems that Aluminum exposure and harm, can come from many different ways, and is very much something to seriously have concerns about. And its alarming if you look a bit deeper at other medicines such as common antacids, taken by millions of people around the world for indigestion, calls for even more concern. Talcid, which is made by Bayer which contains an aluminum derivative clearly states on the insert that:
'long-term use of high dosage may lead to aluminum deposits in bone and nerve tissue. This may lead to brain damage (dementia) and anaemia. In the case of renal insufficiency and long term use of Talcid necessitates regular check of patient's aluminum levels'
WOW, right from the horses mouth. The drug company is clearly stating that aluminum can cause dementia! Yep, now you know that they know.
It's a little bit sinister isn't it, that these 'Science' websites are trying to discredit little old me - who receives no funding from anyone I want to ad, yet they don't even know what they are talking about. Have they read the package insert of antacids and other medications containing Aluminium derivatives I wonder?
And if anyone wants to dispute that Vaccines aren't proven to cause autism and mentions Dr Wakefield being a fraud, then why are these 28 studies published in highly esteemed medical journals showing the same findings as his? Sense About Science are the type of organisation that say there's no link, yet LOOK right here, theres proof that it is true.
Here is a list of 28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s research:
- The Journal of Pediatrics November 1999; 135(5):559-63
- The Journal of Pediatrics 2000; 138(3): 366-372
- Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003; 23(6): 504-517
- Journal of Neuroimmunology 2005
- Brain, Behavior and Immunity 1993; 7: 97-103
- Pediatric Neurology 2003; 28(4): 1-3
- Neuropsychobiology 2005; 51:77-85
- The Journal of Pediatrics May 2005;146(5):605-10
- Autism Insights 2009; 1: 1-11
- Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology February 2009; 23(2): 95-98
- Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 2009:21(3): 148-161
- Journal of Child Neurology June 29, 2009; 000:1-6
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders March 2009;39(3):405-13
- Medical Hypotheses August 1998;51:133-144.
- Journal of Child Neurology July 2000; ;15(7):429-35
- Lancet. 1972;2:883–884.
- Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia January-March 1971;1:48-62
- Journal of Pediatrics March 2001;138:366-372.
- Molecular Psychiatry 2002;7:375-382.
- American Journal of Gastroenterolgy April 2004;598-605.
- Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003;23:504-517.
- Neuroimmunology April 2006;173(1-2):126-34.
- Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol Biol. Psychiatry December 30 2006;30:1472-1477.
- Clinical Infectious Diseases September 1 2002;35(Suppl 1):S6-S16
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004;70(11):6459-6465
- Journal of Medical Microbiology October 2005;54:987-991
- Archivos venezolanos de puericultura y pediatría 2006; Vol 69 (1): 19-25.
- Gastroenterology. 2005:128 (Suppl 2);Abstract-303
This where I found writing this article so much fun! For those that are interested in Sense About Science; they say they are a charity and pretty much rely on outside funding and guess where most of it looks like it comes from? Pharmaceutical and chemical companies. And, yes, I'm being a bit lazy here, as I'm just cutting and pasting this next section from wikipedia and it is a bit out of date, but I think you will see what I found is enough to prove my point!
Funding for the trust has been increasing. Some is derived from industrial organizations engaged in scientific dispute, clinical trials and research for which SAS is supportive (e.g. genetically modified crops) as well as major publishing houses. For example for the fiscal year ending 5 April 2008, the trust received £145,902 in donations. Disclosed corporate donations comprised £88,000 with pharmaceutical company Astra Zeneca donating £35,000. Previous donations included other pharmaceutical industries such as Pfizer. This dependency has now been diminished since for the fiscal year ending April 2010, the trust received £183,971 in donations of which only £17,500 was derived from the pharmaceutical industry (Unilever and G E Healthcare), in 2011 the amount diminished further to less than 6% funding derived from industry sources (the trust received £268,184 in donations with £15,000 from industry) with the rest derived from Science Bodies and individuals.
And, I've also now found the direct link to Sense about Science's funding, please check out their huge list thats plain to see - wow, kinda shocking, right?
Do you think perhaps its a bit clearer now to see they may have vested interests to protect and don't want the public understanding that chemicals are dangerous?
I was contacted by someone from Sense About Science to say that its not true, they don't receive any funding from pharmaceutical and chemical companies as of this financial period ending 2014 and to please remove this information But, even if they didn't receive any funds in the last year, that does not mean they haven't received lots of money from them in the past.
And here is when it gets even more suspect, when you take a look at their funding page it says this:
''Sense About Science is grateful to over 6,000 individuals for their contributions received in the last two years, and to the following organisations''
Right. Are you thinking what I am thinking? WHO are the 6000 individuals?? Where are they from, and how much did they give? Sure, some random people will have just donated little bits of money here and there but I am very suspicious of these many thousands of individuals. That's a lot of money!
And just to show you something else quite interesting about how they operate is something I also found online. Seems 'Joss' a man who initially contacted me through my Facebook page (at first he seemed friendly but quickly turned a bit snarky when I told him that I wasn't going to listen to what Sense about Science said especially after I saw their funding sources.). I think he wants to look like he is just a regular dude who just loves science, it now seems clear he has some ties to either Sense About Science or some other organisation associated with them. He is always commenting on this website below, it seems on every topic they have. check it out here:
Isn't it nice how likened me to a dead horse? What a charming chap. And another interesting bit of what he wrote was that 'she thinks you are all in the pay pockets of the chemical industries'. Hmm, might be a good idea to go back now and read again just where Sense About Science either has gotten their funding from in the past.
And on doing a wee bit more googling, I found something Zac Goldsmith, former editor of the Ecologist Magazine wrote about the organisation, seeming to confirm my suspicions. Isn't it very interesting to read what he has to say about them?
George Monbiot, well known author and respected Guardian Journalist also discovered some pretty alarming connections about Sense About Sciences political roots in his article Invasion of The Entryists - How Did A Cultish Political Network become the face of the Scientific Establishment.
After reading George's article, Ive personally now zero doubt that this organisation is spouting out deadly and dangerous advice into the world and are deeply connected to many corporations that are doing the world, a lot of harm. They are also very pro GMO.
And its also interesting to read what some other people have said about the ties between Sense About Science on the Health Unlocked forum:
Is this discussion forum run by Sense About Science?
I notice that Sense about Science 'members' are involved in providing answers to many questions. Given the organisation's close relationship with the healthcare (and other life science) industries, are we seeing a truly balanced view of healthcare in their replies?. In view of the attitude of pharma companies to data disclosure, as demonstrated by Tamiflu, how can ever be confident that commercially-influenced 'evidence' is reliable?
I share your suspicions. This forum feels like the Colosseum on a bad day.
The attempt of so many medical scientists to pretend that somehow there is uncontaminated evidence 'out there' is laughable, not least because from the very beginning, the research questions asked often already set up the answers that will be found and that is because the funding comes from a source that 'prefers' one answer rather than another. You will of course find a cascade of rabid responses will now fall on your head for daring to ask the question you did.
I am sure you are capable of doing your own research but www.theguardian.com/comment... and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense... both offer interesting perspectives and a wealth of bibliographical references that suggest Sense about Science should be treated warily and so too those who rush to answer so many of the questions here. Ho hum, putting my armour on now.
FourMark, I have no 'agenda' to pursue, nor am I irrational or mired in conspiracy theories. I am, in fact, a well qualified life scientist, with 30 years experience in healthcare, 20 of that in industry including in research, marketing and senior management. I speak from a position of knowledge and experience that the influence of the biosciences industry is far greater than most people realise. I personally was paid by one employer to cultivate relationships with clinical opinion leaders to get them to publish industry generated data as if it was their own, to support NICE guidelines that used our products, and I worked with colleagues to devise trials that made our products look good and our competitors' products less favourable. There's a lot of good in the biosciences industry, not least plenty of employment for scientists, some wonderful innovators producing some great medicines and technology, but there's also a lot of murky marketing and an enormous amount of lobbying that goes unseen. Sense About Science looks to me to be part of that.
Yes, there does need to be a better understanding of the science and technology by the general public, as your average person on the street doesn't have the ability to think critically, but the first loyalty of industry is to their shareholders, and if that means burying data (which DID happen with Tamiflu), or spinning out good stories to keep up the shiny image of previously tarnished company, then they will do it.
I also found this from Alliance for Natural Health, a UK not for profit organisation who fight for health freedom in the UK and Europe. When Sense About Science published their guide book saying that Detoxing was a waste of time and not necessary, AnH wrote Debunking Sense About Science Stance on Detox. A scientist and Doctor, have compiled this information. I highly recommend you read it. You can click here to access it.
Anyway, I'm going to finish this here, I've done enough to defend my case in relation to the very valid concerns about aluminium and it's connection to dementia and Alzheimer's and that Sense About Science may not have your best intentions. If you'd like to know more about Aluminium dangers, please view the very informative video below.
'She's In The Business of Selling Books And Products'
I want to make it quite clear as well that long before my book was written or even a twinkle in my eye so to speak, I was a very ill person who could not seem to get better, no matter what doctor I visited. They couldn't find anything wrong with me because they weren't testing me for chemical toxicity, or looking at me holistically! I eventually found out I had been suffering from toxicity that had caused damage to my body including my brain. I had mercury in my body. And more than likely I was suffering from lead toxicity also. I only began to heal when I started taking supplements that were scientifically proven to chelate heavy metals and other toxins from the body. That was my proof that toxicity was in fact my main problem.
What can mainstream science say about how sick I was, that their tests I had always came up negative, yet I was so ill I couldn't walk far or breathe very well, couldn't concentrate, couldn't work, and was so mentally ill that I thought I would never be able to feel sane - yet look where I am today. I do not suffer with any of those problems anymore. And you don't just wake up one morning and feel like a brand new person without effective treatments.
I have a story very similar to hundreds and thousands of others who have had 'mystery illnesses' who had no help from modern medicine and had to look for other outlets to get well. My book only became something real in the last few years. My aim about spreading the awareness of toxicity came about because I was so sick! I didn't just wake up one day and think oh detoxing is a big fad, I might try and take advantage of that and write a book scaring people and I will sell some detox products! My book has over 200 references, with at least another hundred quotes from Doctors, scientists, experts and toxicologists who are very well respected in their fields.
And, I only sell one detox product on my site. I am not someone that has a huge online shop with many different things for sale. So in my defence when someone like Joss says that I am 'in the business of selling books and detox products' I think its clear to see that I am only selling things on a very small scale. Right now I only have two things for sale on my site!
And in regards to pure body, it has been studied in over 300 studies which are found on the Pub med website. I sell this particular brand because its the best I have found, is very effective and very affordable!
There are many organisations that don't want us to know the truth about what is going on with our health, because when the masses find out, there will be mass lawsuits, just like what happened in the days when smoking was touted as safe. It only broke down when a huge lawsuit hit the tobacco industry. And to give you a taste of the sort of money I am talking about that can be won in a lawsuit of this scale, the Tobacco industry had to fork out US$ 205 Billion over a period of 25 years in the USA.(3)
We have to fight for our health and that also means fighting what some mainstream outlets are trying to make us believe!
You can read more about this and other kinds of Toxicity in my book Toxic World, Toxic People which is available for pre order now.
In the near future I will also be writing about the other statements Sense about Science wrote about regarding the very real dangers of Lead, & Mercury.
1 Journal of Medical Case Reports February 10, 2104
2 Vactruth.com Toxic Levels Of Aluminum January 28 2014